Comments on: Ruby Common Object Pool (common-pool) http://www.pluitsolutions.com/2007/05/16/ruby-common-object-pool-common-pool/ Web Developer, Web Designer, Ruby on Rails Developer, a Curious Man based in Singapore Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:18:35 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1 by: Herryanto Siatono http://www.pluitsolutions.com/2007/05/16/ruby-common-object-pool-common-pool/#comment-167266 Wed, 12 Aug 2009 02:15:08 +0000 http://www.pluitsolutions.com/2007/05/16/ruby-common-object-pool-common-pool/#comment-167266 Hi Michael, it has been two years since I wrote this, if I can remember correctly the timeout is the request timeout, it should wait till the timeout period is reached, which by default is set to 60 seconds. The test may not be testing timeout correctly, feel free to write your own test script just to be sure. Hi Michael, it has been two years since I wrote this, if I can remember correctly the timeout is the request timeout, it should wait till the timeout period is reached, which by default is set to 60 seconds.

The test may not be testing timeout correctly, feel free to write your own test script just to be sure.

]]> by: Michael Johnston http://www.pluitsolutions.com/2007/05/16/ruby-common-object-pool-common-pool/#comment-167261 Wed, 12 Aug 2009 01:28:35 +0000 http://www.pluitsolutions.com/2007/05/16/ruby-common-object-pool-common-pool/#comment-167261 what is the benefit of raising immediately when the pool is full? would it be better to timeout first? You have a "test_timeout_reached" but the test actually tests that borrowing from a full pool raises immediately, not that it times out. what is the benefit of raising immediately when the pool is full? would it be better to timeout first? You have a “test_timeout_reached” but the test actually tests that borrowing from a full pool raises immediately, not that it times out.

]]> by: Herryanto Siatono http://www.pluitsolutions.com/2007/05/16/ruby-common-object-pool-common-pool/#comment-29120 Wed, 16 May 2007 16:02:00 +0000 http://www.pluitsolutions.com/2007/05/16/ruby-common-object-pool-common-pool/#comment-29120 Thanks Joe, we often use memcache for object pooling, I guess common pool suits more for those who needs the extra jazz, like nee to keep minimum idle, mantaining maximum idle and checking if evict idle if required. Thanks Joe, we often use memcache for object pooling, I guess common pool suits more for those who needs the extra jazz, like nee to keep minimum idle, mantaining maximum idle and checking if evict idle if required.

]]> by: Joe Goh http://www.pluitsolutions.com/2007/05/16/ruby-common-object-pool-common-pool/#comment-29068 Wed, 16 May 2007 08:35:12 +0000 http://www.pluitsolutions.com/2007/05/16/ruby-common-object-pool-common-pool/#comment-29068 Good stuff! Although I don't code in Ruby and this should prove amazingly useful to people creating Rails based websites with lots of traffic. I'm quite surprised that no one has done it before actually. Are there other common pool implementations for Ruby? Good stuff! Although I don’t code in Ruby and this should prove amazingly useful to people creating Rails based websites with lots of traffic.

I’m quite surprised that no one has done it before actually. Are there other common pool implementations for Ruby?

]]>